The
first thing that came to mind when reading Ernest Hemingway's début
novel (called the far less evocative Fiesta
in Europe) was the similarity to Fitzgerald – bored émigrés,
alcohol, self-destruction and loveless, sadistic relationships –
although, I suppose, this is inevitable given that Fitzgerald was my
introduction to modern American literature. The congruity seems to
imply that both authors were effective documenters of a certain ethos
following the First World War, and a strong sense of despair,
nihilism and impotence running through a whole class. The
Sun Also Rises
suffers in comparison to Fitzgerald's work, particularly The
Great Gatsby
and Tender
is the Night,
because of its locality and specificity: the sorrows of Hemingway's
characters never seem to represent the sorrows of the American, or
perhaps the human, condition as Fitzgerald's do. The scale seems more
intimate.
The vast majority of the novel relates a group of acquaintances'
experiences at a Pamplona fiesta, most of which consist of drinking
to excess, brawling with one another and watching bulls get slowly
killed in the ring. Hemingway is enthusiastic about all these
activities – his passion for bullfighting is well documented –
and this conveys itself in the astonishing vividness and vitality of
his prose: the excitement of the fiesta, the dancing with locals, the
early morning wine and late evening coffee, the scorching midday sun,
the crowds and the bulls themselves.
The bullfighting and the alcoholism provide the substance of
Hemingway's thematic intention. The heights of emotion reached during
a bullfight, the goading and taunting, and the aggression seem to
represent one end of the characters' emotional scale; the opiate
effect of alcohol, the passivity and impotence it causes, the other
end. And yet alcohol catalyses some of the conflicts of the novel; to
exaggerate feelings and exacerbate tensions; it empowers at the same
time as it hinders. Perhaps its greater significance is the loss of
control it causes, which is reflected in the characters' dependent
financial situations and, for most of the male characters, dependent
emotional situations: almost every man in the novel seems to be
intolerably in love with the vivacious Brett.
Most interesting of these suitors is the character of Cohn,
introduced at the beginning as a sort of hero. Cohn remains, however,
a somewhat pathetic figure throughout, unwanted and uncared for, yet
curiously arrogant; weak and cowering, yet, thanks to his boxing, the
most physically capable character; curiously without influence in a
narrative dominated by Brett's whims. The reader's perception of Cohn
is certainly distorted by the first person narration, but this does
not fully explain his often objectionable behaviour. Some readers
have decided that this complexity in the novel's 'hero' can be
resolved by declaring that Hemingway is an anti-Semite, or that he
was trying to reflect the racism in this society.
An anti-Semitic reading avoids the true fascination of Cohn: if he is
to be the hero, does that leave the other characters, so often his
opponents, as villains? Is Cohn truly meant to be aspirational, or is
he intended as some kind of critique? Hemingway's decision to thrust
Cohn to the side of his narrative leave these questions unanswered,
and his début novel tantalisingly incomplete.